Technology
Machine learning fits because compliance is full of uncertainty. There is no universal law of the case: the model is learned from that organisation’s data. It classifies, detects a pattern, points to a gap.
MIA
MIA is a living intelligence, still at its dawn. It is born of ordering the norms, of years of practice in risk management, and of the wish to correct course from within while the boat keeps sailing.
An intelligence created from the ordered conceptualisation of the norms, from the knowledge that years of practice give, and from the wish to change course and correct errors, from within.
The journey has only just begun. The challenges ahead are immense beside what we have already learned, we and MIA herself. That is why we picture her young: dressed in green, with a gaze that is still learning and does not quite say whether it is human or synthetic.
She will learn what we teach her. We accompany her as she learns. She astonishes us, the way someone astonishes us whose talent has not finished growing. If she were a car, she would be a Formula One: the place where the latest advances are tested, always improving. MIA is to compliance what the leap to electric was to cars.
01
02
Machine learning fits because compliance is full of uncertainty. There is no universal law of the case: the model is learned from that organisation’s data. It classifies, detects a pattern, points to a gap.
MIA learns what we teach her, and we accompany her. Two observers of the same event do not qualify it in the same way. The algorithm orders the file. The decision stays with whoever holds the judgement.
Everything starts from the norm and returns to it. Legal intelligence is collecting, evaluating, analysing and interpreting until data become useful knowledge. The destination is legal certainty.
03
In late 2015, with Universidad Complutense, the first team was formed to join mathematics and law. The question was specific: value a company’s non-compliance by its economic risk. The first frame was the Spanish Data Protection Agency, because it is cross-cutting and European.
Take compliance into a concrete business setting. Study the space between the company, the norm and predictive statistics.
A probabilistic formulation. And another, when the data are not sharp, with fuzzy mathematics and aggregation operators.
Turn the subjectivity of “we comply” into a result that can be reviewed.
Carry that procedure into software that works automatically, with the main purpose of helping organisations meet their duty to comply.
R(e) = Σ inc(n, e) · f(incum, pr)The risk of company e depends, for each norm n that applies to it, on the degree of non-compliance and on the probability of detection and sanction.
04
The roadmap set out in 2015 moved through several cycles. The last one is intelligence. That cycle is the starting moment of MIA. Along the way, each monograph consolidated a change in understanding.
The transformation was not only digital. It was organic, from the foundations to the understanding of compliance itself. The method of measurement is in Risk approach. The names and the calendar are in Origin.